H.265 may be superior to H.264 in the next 5 or 10 years along with the popular application and streaming of 4K UHD resolution, but right now if your gadget's resolution is up to 720p/1080p, H.264 is more suitable. Namely, H.265/HEVC is not widely applied in many product fields so far, except a few devices and media players like iPhone 6/later, Windows 10, VLC, etc.Ģ. For instance, GoPro 4K HEVC videos are not friendly to many editor apps. Below are two disadvantages of H.265 compared with H.264:ġ.
However, bear in mind that H.265 is still less common than its predecessor (H.264) in the industry. This is quite helpful for your viewers in that their devices will require less bandwidth and processing power to decompress all information and watch a stream. This enables H.265 to compress information more efficiently.Īdditionally, H.265 also has an improved motion compensation and spatial prediction than H.264 does. Although macroblocks can go anywhere from 4×4 to 16×16 block sizes, CTUs are able to process up to 64×64 blocks. Then, another perk of H.265 is the fact that it processes data in coding tree units. This significantly lowers the required bandwidth. The biggest difference here is that H.265/HEVC allows for further reduced file size of your live video streams. H.265 is more advanced than H.264 because of various reasons. When you examine the technology behind these two codecs, you can easily conclude which one wins in our article on H.264 vs. H.264: Which One Is Better? Why We Need to Convert HEVC to H.264?
HEVC CODEC LINUX FREE
Transcode HEVC to H.264 Free with Handbrake Convert HEVC/H.265 to H.264 with DumboFab Video Converter - Fast and Lossless Click the links below to jump to the part you are most interested in.
0 kommentar(er)
